statecraft.
Catalog/rustev

022-jev-production-transport

Production transport and served identity for the Jev adapter (amends 012)

Lifecycle approvedImplementation completeVerification unknownQualification unknown

The separately reviewable spec 012 amendment that backlog item RUSTEV-010 and spec 012 R-3 require before production use: a Jev binding is production-eligible only when its transport pins a model version and every answered exchange proves the served identity against that pin. Defines the qualification of TypeSafe's direct API with a pinned version, the evidence under which Gateway pinning could be accepted instead, and the transport, TLS, timeout, connection, privacy and cost-reconciliation facts a production binding records. Development evidence with `served: unknown` is never relabeled as production evidence. Approved (A-21) with the additions of tracking issue #76 child C3 (section 3.8). Approval authorizes implementation of the no-network stage; live stages stay inside R-29's testing cap, and no deployment is authorized.

Read the full pinned specification ↗

Relationships

Claimed units

  • extends
    {
  "nature": "amending",
  "spec": "012-jev-integration",
  "unit": {
    "kind": "directory",
    "path": "integrations/rustev-jev/"
  }
}
  • extends
    {
  "nature": "additive",
  "spec": "001-boundaries-and-authority",
  "unit": {
    "kind": "file",
    "path": "Makefile"
  }
}
  • extends
    {
  "nature": "additive",
  "spec": "001-boundaries-and-authority",
  "unit": {
    "kind": "directory",
    "path": "scripts/acceptance/"
  }
}

Source headings

  1. 022: Production transport and served identity for the Jev adapter (amends 012)
  2. 1. Purpose
  3. 2. Territory
  4. 3. Behavior
  5. 3.1 Production eligibility
  6. 3.2 Direct transport with a pin
  7. 3.3 Gateway pinning as an alternative
  8. 3.4 Transport facts of a production binding
  9. 3.5 Cost reconciliation
  10. 3.6 Evidence and requalification
  11. 3.7 Qualification stages
  12. 3.8 Additions from the tracking issue (C3)
  13. 4. Out of scope
  14. 5. Observable negative cases
  15. Acceptance
  16. Verification
  17. Implementation record
  18. Questions settled at approval

Frozen anchors

No frozen anchors declared.